Research Reference · Mental Health Data

TCK Mental Health by the Numbers — ACE Score Tier and PCE Score Tier

Every mental health statistic from the research on Third Culture Kids, organized by adversity tier and protective experience tier. No narrative. All data.

Anna Danforth
Nourished, 2026
Sources: Crossman et al. (2025b) · Bethell et al. (2019) · Crossman & Wells (2022)
How to Read This Page

Statistics are organized into two tiers: ACE Score (Adverse Childhood Experiences — risk factors) and PCE Score (Positive Childhood Experiences — protective factors). High ACE scores show what happens without support. High PCE scores show what becomes possible with it. Both tiers measure the same population — TCKs — from opposite directions.

How TCKs Compare to the General Population

21%
High ACE Rate

of TCKs reported 4 or more ACEs — nearly double the general population rate of 12.5%.

1 in 3
Highly Mobile TCKs

Highly mobile TCKs have a 1 in 3 chance of high ACE scores — vs. 1 in 10 in the general population.

44%
Lifetime Diagnosis

of all TCKs were diagnosed with a mental health condition in their lifetime.

74%
Adequate PCEs

of TCKs had 5 or more PCEs — nearly 3 in 4 are getting the connections they need to flourish.

What High ACE Scores Produce

All statistics in this tier compare TCKs with 4 or more ACEs against TCKs with no ACEs, unless otherwise noted. Source: Crossman et al. (2025b).

4+ ACEs vs. 0 ACEs
Relative Risk Multipliers
How many times more likely a TCK with 4+ ACEs is to experience each outcome
3.6×
Anxiety more likely vs. TCKs with no ACEs
4.7×
Depression more likely vs. TCKs in the U.S. and Ireland
11.7×
PTSD more likely vs. TCKs with no ACEs
2.5×
PTSD more likely vs. general ACE populations in other countries
15×
Suicidal ideation more likely vs. TCKs with no ACEs
18×
Self-harm more likely vs. TCKs with no ACEs
4+ ACEs — Diagnoses
Formal Diagnosis Rates
Percentage of TCKs with 4+ ACEs who received a clinical diagnosis
Mental Health
29%
Depression — nearly 1 in 3
Crossman et al., 2025b
27%
Anxiety — more than 1 in 4
Crossman et al., 2025b
13%
PTSD — 1 in 8
Crossman et al., 2025b
12%
Suicidal ideation — more than 1 in 10
Crossman et al., 2025b
7%
Self-harm — 1 in 14
Crossman et al., 2025b
6%
Disordered eating — 1 in 17
Crossman et al., 2025b
The Diagnosis Gap
Experienced vs. Formally Diagnosed
Many TCKs experience these conditions without receiving a diagnosis — due to mobility, finances, and limited access to care
Condition Formally Diagnosed Actually Experienced Gap
Suicidal Ideation 12%
47%
35 pts
Disordered Eating 6%
30%
24 pts
Self-Harm 7%
22%
15 pts
4+ ACEs — Physical Health
Physical Health Outcomes
Increased risk vs. TCKs with no ACEs — comparable risk level to heavy smoking for heart disease and cancer
Asthma
Crossman et al., 2025b
2.4×
Migraines
Crossman et al., 2025b
2.5×
Heart disease
Crossman et al., 2025b
2.7×
Diabetes
Crossman et al., 2025b
Autoimmune disease
Crossman et al., 2025b
3.3×
Other chronic illnesses
Crossman et al., 2025b
4+ ACEs — Lifestyle
Lifestyle Risk Factors in Adulthood
Increased risk vs. TCKs with no ACEs — not moral failures; survival strategies without support
11×
Prescription drug abuse
Crossman et al., 2025b
25+ sexual partners
Crossman et al., 2025b
3.9×
Alcohol abuse
Crossman et al., 2025b
3.5×
Smoking
Crossman et al., 2025b
3.2×
Illicit drug use
Crossman et al., 2025b
Adult Relational Outcomes
Belonging and Adult Struggles
Reported across all TCKs with high ACE scores in adulthood
75%
Belonging — nearly 3 in 4 adult TCKs struggle with a sense of belonging. The single most commonly reported adult challenge.
Crossman et al., 2025b
34%
Childhood mental health crisis — 1 in 3 TCKs experienced a mental health crisis during childhood.
Crossman et al., 2025a
Additional Reported Adult Struggles (all TCKs with high ACEs)
Perpetual restlessness and inability to settle
Crossman et al., 2025b
Identity uncertainty and difficulty answering "where are you from?"
Crossman et al., 2025b
Fear of commitment in relationships
Crossman et al., 2025b
Unexpected sadness or anger tied to the global upbringing
Crossman et al., 2025b
Ambiguous loss and unresolved grief
Crossman et al., 2025b
Difficulty regulating emotions
Crossman et al., 2025b
ACEs by Sector
Percentage of TCKs with 4+ ACEs by Expat Sector
Source: Crossman & Wells, 2022
Business
29%
Diplomats
27%
Military
25%
Education / NGO
19%
Missions
17%
General population
10%

What High PCE Scores Protect Against

All statistics compare TCKs with 7 PCEs against TCKs with 0–2 PCEs. This is the protective effect of building a connected village. Source: Crossman et al. (2025b).

0–2 PCEs
27%
of TCKs have fewer than 5 PCEs — including 8% at critically low connection of 0–2
vs
7 PCEs
3.5×
more likely to have strong emotional support and relationships in adulthood — Bethell et al., 2019
7 PCEs vs. 0–2 PCEs
How Much Less Likely — Across Four Domains
Percentage reduction in risk for TCKs with 7 PCEs compared to TCKs with 0–2 PCEs
Mental Health Diagnoses
86%
less likely to be diagnosed with PTSD
85%
less likely to be diagnosed with self-harm
62%
less likely to be diagnosed with anxiety
55%
less likely to be diagnosed with an eating disorder
Emotional Wellbeing
82%
less likely to deal with unexpected anger related to growing up abroad
72%
less likely to struggle to regulate emotions
63%
less likely to experience unexpected sadness related to growing up abroad
54%
less likely to struggle with fear of commitment
Physical Health
65%
less likely to be diagnosed with autoimmune disease
38%
less likely to be diagnosed with heart disease
28%
less likely to be diagnosed with migraines
Lifestyle Choices in Adulthood
91%
less likely to abuse prescription drugs
80%
less likely to have 25+ sexual partners
72%
less likely to abuse alcohol and drugs
63%
less likely to smoke
PCEs + ACEs Combined
PCEs Protect Even When ACEs Are High
The protective effect of PCEs holds regardless of adversity score
98%
of TCKs with high PCE scores rated the global upbringing as a good experience overall — regardless of their ACE score.
Crossman et al., 2025b
27%
more likely to feel a sense of purpose for TCKs with a low ACE score who also had a high PCE score.
Crossman et al., 2025b
35%
more likely to feel a sense of purpose for TCKs with a high ACE score who also had a high PCE score. PCEs help most when children need it most.
Crossman et al., 2025b
72%
less likely to experience depression for children with 6–7 PCEs vs. 0–2, regardless of other factors.
Bethell et al., 2019
50%
reduction in depression for children who could talk to their family about feelings — PCE #1 alone.
Bethell et al., 2019

Building positive experiences helps most when children need it most — creating pathways to purpose and belonging even in difficult circumstances.

Anna Danforth · Nourished, Chapter 4 — citing Crossman et al., 2025b

Free Assessment

Find Out Where Your Child Stands

The Nourished PCE Simulator maps all 8 protective experiences for your child and shows you exactly where the gaps are — and what to do about each one.

Take Assessment →